A
controversial scheme to licence sea angling in the draft Marine Bill to be
published around Easter 2008, could become bureaucratic, covering only its own
costs and not bring any benefits to sea anglers.
Although the bill was not specifically mentioned in the Queen’s speech to
parliament today (Tuesday), the government confirmed that it was still
committed to bringing it before parliament during the next parliament.
Angling organisations predict only a quarter of the country’s one million sea
anglers would pay up for licences. That would generate up to £3.5 million
a year and just about cover the cost of administration and enforcement, leaving
no funds to develop the sport.
In a summary of public responses to the proposed licences, the environment
department (Defra) says the main reasons behind the opposition were that the
impact of recreational sea angling was considered much less significant than
commercial fishing. Licensing was not needed to control it and other
recreational users of the sea were not licensed.
“The public responses to this licensing proposal reflected much that we have
urged on Defra for the last two years,” said Richard Ferré, chairman of the
National Federation of Sea Anglers.
“Of 271 comments on ideas for modernising sea fisheries’ management, 55 were
from recreational sea angling,” he said. “That shows the depth of feeling
against arbitrary licensing and we will continue our determined opposition.”
Defra said a number of respondents considered that occasional sea anglers would
be put off by the need for a licence and that might have an adverse effect on
the angling boat charter business.
Mr. Ferré said this would particularly affect those on holiday with children
Anglers and others who conditionally supported or were neutral towards
licences, said fishstocks would have to be significantly improved to make them
acceptable. Any revenue must be returned to the angling sector otherwise they
would be seen as an additional tax.
Respondents who supported licences saw it as a means for sea anglers to
influence government fisheries policy and increase financial support for sea
angling.
Defra’s summary said many respondents supported the ability to apply set bag
limits on the number of fish which can be retained under certain conditions,
such as essential conservation, but applied proportionately to all
fishing. Recreational sea anglers said imposing bag limits on them to
reserve fish stocks for others was unacceptable.
http://www.nfsa.org.uk












