that's really interesting bud. After seeing your video I did some raking about and found this
article and it was very insightful. wouldn't mind hearing your thoughts on it.
Had a quick look but will go over it again later, it certainly looks interesting and backs much of what I've said on here for years.
I took several different fluro lines ( 5 ) and 5 mono's to a depth of 34 m on scuba to see how they all compared to the human eye. Funny enough all the lines were easy to see with and without led dive lights. Nowhere have I found the science where fishes eyesight has been tested for fluro, the fact fish have such different sight among species makes invisible to fish even more doubtful.
Catch tests in side by side rigs on popular species such as snapper and bream actually showed a higher catch rate for us using mono.
Knot strength for someone like myself that likes to fish very light means having to use fluro way heavier than mono to maintain knot strength. Gently teasing and wetting knots in an upside down looking uni knot I found on YouTube did slightly improve the fluro knot strength. The fact I had to use almost double the strength fluro reduced finicky fish. No problem if you are targeting bass with 20-30 lb leaders and 1 lb of drag like most who swear by it.
One of my biggest gripes is the fact there is so much plastic waste using a spool for just 25 yards or so. Even bulk spools of 50 or 100 are pretty wasteful. The final nail in the coffin for me is the price, why pay more for 100m than I can buy 1000m of a quality mono such as mamoi.
These are my own opinions, I'm fortunate enough to catch hard fighting fish regularly in good numbers. I also regularly try out things I've not been impressed with in the past and will happily test out more fluro, just not on a day where the catch is important to me.