There is nothing for me to be defensive about, I have given you the email address via PM as mentioned, these will put you in direct contact with the Head of Campaigns so you can here what the AT is doing from the horses mouth instead of mine. You will either use them or not.Reg, you were the one who jumped in and responded to me when I was replying to Mart post about issues with landing data and the illegal landings of bass in nets. You jumped in and brought up the AT and told us how they were working on this issue. I didn't ask you to comment and tell us that but as you made that claim I asked you to supply details. Now you seem very defensive and unprepared or unable to give details.
To suggest that I am only concentrating only on what concerns me is completely untrue and totally unfair. You know absolutely nothing about me or what I have or haven't done in terms of conservation over the years. I would suggest that the illegal targeting of bass in nets is something that concerns the overwhelming majority of bass anglers and not just me. I would hope that the AT recognise that is the case too. The introduction of a % to define unavoidable bycatch would sort this is issue once and for all. You claimed the AT were working on this issue. I simply asked for details. You have yet to supply any. Please do so or don't bother to respond.