It seems Chinese quality is an issue in this thread. Generally, I have found that Chinese quality is the minimum acceptable to the consumer for what is being paid. For the Consumer, it is the best quality for the minimum amount paid.
Chinese quality is not the issue, but quality promoted to be 'like Fuji', 'similar to Fuji', etc, when basically they are copying Fuji designs and developments, and passing them off as their own. An example from your earlier post "
RS Ring material, Similar to Fuji Torzite", when in fact the 'RS' ceramic is nothing more than Zirconium Oxide, which is actually a grade of ceramic 'lower' than SiC, and nothing like Torzite.
This is Chinese business at its best, copy others to save the cost of research and development, and if unsupervised pass off lower quality products as 'high quality'.
I have nothing against Chinese manufacturers when they are supervised by parent company engineers, like Quantum and others; though I'm not sure about the 'Fuji story', I get nearly all my guides and reel seats from Fuji, and they are packaged in boxes marked - 'Made in Japan'. However, if they are made in China, then as you have stated, they are built with genuine Fuji materials, under full Fuji supervision, so unlikely to suffer from a quality point of view.
The adage that: "
Chinese quality is the minimum acceptable to the consumer for what is being paid", is perhaps a little invalid; if they do not fully and truly disclose the materials being used. This was the core of a near full blown legal case against PacBay, where products declared and promoted for 'salt water use', were in fact 'not fit for purpose' (guides that rusted when just stored in a coastal region), and only after initial legal representations were made, did PacBay back down and offer full redress. The fact that the following years publication of their catalogue changed those same products to a newly formed 'fresh water' section, with a small print rider, not suitable for extreme salt water environments.
Equally, Sea Guide offer 3 levels of products in their range, the top line are stated as 316 stainless steel, middle range are stated as 304 stainless steel, while the lowest range don't actually define what the guide frames are actually made of - so, "
for the Consumer, it is the best quality for the minimum amount paid", becomes a mute point, especially if it is your own hard earned cash that you are parting with for an undeclared lowest quality product, that will in all likelihood fail long before even the basic of Fuji products - where all frames are made of 316 stainless steel, and have been for the last 30+ years; with the exception of their Titanium range.